UK entrepreneur turns down live TV debate and says government should instead engage with local activists.
It was an attempt to set up Singapore’s minister for home affairs and minister for law, K Shanmugam, as “a Singaporean nationalist standing firm against a sanctimonious western interloper … Kirsten Han, a Singaporean journalist and activist, described the offer of a TV debate as “political theatre”. The Singaporean government has defended its use of the death penalty, including its handling of Nagaenthran’s case, denying he had learning difficulties. In the four years after the mandatory capital sentence was introduced for opium trafficking, there was a 66% reduction in the average net weight of opium trafficked into Singapore, it said in its statement to Branson. It said that, while Branson’s views may be widely held in the UK, “we do not accept that Mr Branson or others in the west are entitled to impose their values on other societies. Singapore, which has some of the world’s most severe drugs laws, provoked an outcry in April when it executed Nagaenthran, a Malaysian man, who campaigners say had learning difficulties.
The British billionaire was invited to discuss his views on capital punishment alongside Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam. Branson previously criticized the ...
[turning down the debate](https://www.virgin.com/branson-family/richard-branson-blog/my-response-to-singapores-home-affairs-minister-on-the-death-penalty), saying that such events are “always at risk of prioritizing personalities over issues—[and] cannot do the complexity of the death penalty any service.” [hit back](https://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/press-releases/ministry-of-home-affairs-response-to-sir-richard-branson-blog-post-on-10-october-2022) at the billionaire saying it does not accept that anyone in the West is “entitled to impose their values on other societies.” In particular, Branson has spoken out against a case in which a Malaysian man, Nagaenthran Dharmalingam, was caught bringing 43 grams of heroin into the country in 2009; any amount of heroin over 15 grams amounts to the death penalty in Singapore.
The entrepreneur is a long campaigner against capital punishment and was invited for a debate which would also cover the nation's approach to drugs.
In a blog post about his decision to turn down the TV debate, Branson said: "I have decided to decline this invitation. History has proven him right, time and again." He said the "conversation needs local voices" and he was a "global advocate for abolition of the death penalty" and would "continue to raise the issue wherever I can, as I have for many years". Branson added that imposing the death penalty for drugs offences was a "disproportionate and ineffective response to the world's drug problems". The British entrepreneur said he has "enormous respect" for the country and it was because of this that he feels "compelled to speak out" when he sees things "go horribly wrong as Singapore's use of the death penalty". [Branson](http://news.sky.com/topic/richard-branson-7594) said the discussion "cannot do the complexity of the death penalty any service" and called on [Singapore](https://news.sky.com/topic/singapore-6972) to embrace a "constructive, lasting dialogue involving multiple stakeholders".
British entrepreneur Richard Branson declined an invitation from the Singapore government to attend a debate over death penalty.
Several activists have criticised the government for taking a hard stance on the topic and said that the invitation to Branson was a “diversion tactic”. British entrepreneur Richard Branson declined an invitation from the Singapore government to attend a debate over death penalty. Branson has spoken out against the Singapore government since the hanging took place in April this year and the country’s interior ministry extended the invitation for a public debate.
Richard Branson, the British entrepreneur, has declined to participate in a live television discussion, stating that the government should instead connect ...
It is unable to handle the complexities of the death penalty. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). It lowers complex communication to catchphrases while elevating the substantive discussion to the level of spectacle. He was a Malaysian man with a cognitive handicap. He had been on death row for over a decade, trying to sneak 42.72g of heroin into Singapore. According to a report by AFP, call it a space race for billionaires: British mogul Richard Branson one-upped rival Jeff Bezos on July 1, announcing that he too will blast beyond Earth's atmosphere -- as many as nine days ahead of the Amazon founder.
Singapore had invited Richard Branson to a live TV debate after he criticised the city state's death penalty as brutal.
“A television debate – limited in time and scope, always at risk of prioritising personalities over issues – cannot do the complexity of the death penalty any service,” he said. Singapore has some of the world’s toughest anti-narcotics laws and insists the death penalty remains an effective deterrent against trafficking. The ministry rejected Branson’s comments, saying it did not accept that anyone in the West was “entitled to impose their values on other societies”. He added that abolition of the death penalty was not a “Western concept imposed on the rest of the world”. “It reduces nuanced discourse to soundbites, turns serious debate into spectacle. [execute a Malaysian man convicted of drug trafficking](/news/2022/4/27/holdnagaenthran-hanged-at-dawn-in-singapore) in April, said on Monday that a televised live debate “cannot do the complexity of the death penalty any service”.
The British billionaire has spoken out about Singapore's death penalty for crimes such as drug trafficking.
Click here to find out more about our partners. Find out more about how we use your information in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. You can select 'Manage settings' for more information and to manage your choices.
British entrepreneur Richard Branson has declined an invitation from the Singaporean government to take part in a live television debate on the death ...
“We do not accept that Mr Branson or others in the West are entitled to impose their values on other societies,” the statement continued. He also argued that “local voices” would be of more value than his own. “The truth is that Singapore’s government seems bent on executing scores of low-level drug-traffickers, mostly members of poor, disadvantaged minorities, whilst failing to provide clear evidence that it has any tanigble impact on drug use, crime, or public safety,” he wrote. But a [open letter posted on his blog](https://www.virgin.com/branson-family/richard-branson-blog/my-response-to-singapores-home-affairs-minister-on-the-death-penalty?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_author=richard), Branson said television debates are “always at risk of prioritizing personalities over issues” and “cannot do the complexity of the death penalty any service.” [blog post](https://www.virgin.com/branson-family/richard-branson-blog/heartbroken-over-singapores-execution-of-nagen) at the time, Branson called the news “heart-breaking,” and spoke out against Singapore’s “relentless machinery of death.”