SINGAPORE — The High Court has dismissed several applications brought by political activist Han Hui Hui and five others to quash vaccine-related regulations ...
It had merely reiterated the Government’s announcement on such measures, he added. Given these statistics, the applicants argued that there were no reasonable or rational grounds for the advisory and the announcement to be issued and that they had suffered detriment as a result of the vaccine-related regulations. They also claimed that there were more fully vaccinated Covid-19 patients in hospital who were critically ill as of Dec 6 last year and that data also showed that on April 10 this year, nobody in the intensive care unit aged 70 and above was not fully vaccinated. As for the statistics that they presented, the applicants claimed that their own calculations, based on MOH’s public health data on the pandemic, showed that there were more vaccinated people who died due to Covid-19 as of Dec 5 last year compared to unvaccinated people. The applicants had also applied for the court to declare that the advisory and the announcement were unlawful or irrational, or both. The applicants had pointed to public health data, among other things, which they claimed showed that the people who were not vaccinated against Covid-19 were not causing a disproportionate strain on healthcare resources and that the data refutes the Government’s assertion that a fully vaccinated person was less likely to die or fall seriously ill from Covid-19.
The High Court has dismissed a bid by political activist Han Hui Hui and five other people to quash COVID-19 vaccine-related measures rolled out by the ...
“I find that the (multi-ministry task force) and MOH have acted in good faith by relying on proper reasons which have been backed by objective evidence. Justice Gill also added that the “narrow group” of non-fully vaccinated people aged 70 and above “can hardly be said to be a good representation” of the entire population of people who were unvaccinated. “It is more accurate to compare the incidence rates of (critically ill) cases in the entire fully vaccinated population and the entire non-fully vaccinated population,” he said. Last October, authorities said employers may terminate their workers’ employment as a last resort, if alternative work arrangements could not be made. They also claimed that there were more vaccinated people who were critically ill with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared to those who were unvaccinated. They also applied to quash the “directive” from the Ministry of Health (MOH) which stated that COVID-19 patients who remain unvaccinated by choice will have to pay the cost of their medical treatment in full.
The application was made by six unvaccinated people, including activist and blogger Han Hui Hui. Read more at straitstimes.com.
He cited studies showing that unvaccinated people are more likely to get infected and pass the virus on, as well as die or become severely ill and strain the healthcare system. If the group disagrees with the substance of this policy - that is, if they believe that people who remain unvaccinated by choice should have their medical bills covered if they get Covid-19 - this is not a matter for the court, he added. Their numbers were also incorrect, the judge added. On Dec 6, 18 fully vaccinated people were critically ill, compared with 29 people in the non-fully vaccinated group. On Dec 4, there were seven deaths among those not fully vaccinated, while no deaths were reported among those fully vaccinated. It cited statistics on death and critical illness rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated people, which the group had calculated based on official data made public by the Ministry of Health (MOH).