Roe v. Wade

In an unprecedented revelation, a document written by conservative justice Samuel Alito says 'Roe was egregiously wrong from the start'.

Competing at the Penn Relays, America’s oldest track and field meet, he surged over the line in a time of 26.34 seconds. Nearly a quarter of a century after breaking one sprinting world record aged 76-year-old, Lester Wright was back in form as he set the official 100m world record for centenarians. The largest active wildfire in the US has forced thousands from their homes in New Mexico, as unusually fast-spreading blazes dot the drought-stricken south-west. As a brutal heatwave has swept across India and Pakistan, Turbat, in Pakistan’s Balochistan region, has been suffering through weeks of temperatures that have repeatedly hit almost 50C (122F), unprecedented for this time of year. “I feel good,” a ludicrously youthful Graham Nash tells Simon Hattenstone. “Eighty years old and still rocking.” And some. She ischarged with two counts under the country’s Anti-Corruption Act, with each count punishable by up to 15 years in prison. The back of his coat read “End Gun Violence” in red lettering. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.” The incident was filmed by onlookers and footage quickly spread online. The justice adds: “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. Musk is in talks with large investment firms and high net-worth individuals totake on more financing. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences.

Both President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned on protecting the constitutional right to abortion. Once Biden was elected, it was ...

When asked about the president’s stance on the issue, Press Secretary Jen Psaki has said Biden supports “a woman’s right to choose” and has said he believes “it’s up to a woman to make those decisions,” but does not mention abortion. “It’s hard to have a conversation about abortion policy in this country when you can’t say the word abortion.” Just weeks after the election, it was announced that the press secretary post and all of the top positions of the White House communications team would be held by women.

If the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down the landmark decision, it will have a major impact in states across the country that have already signaled their ...

You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.

The bombshell revelation on Monday night that the Supreme Court is preparing to strike down Roe v. Wade promises to consume Washington in the months ahead ...

“Trump has signaled that he believes the key to a potential run for president in 2024 is showing that he can still shape the GOP.” This is the right thing to do,” Warren said in a statement to the Early 202. Eliminating $50,000 would reduce the number of people with student loans from 15 percent to 2 percent in the lowest economic quintile. Warren said the study shows that higher levels of debt cancellation is necessary for the lowest income borrowers to benefit. Voters in Indiana will also go to the polls” today. A new academic study on who is impacted by student debt cancellation shows that cancelling $50,000 worth of student loan debts impacts significantly more people and helps to close the racial wealth gap. The news could also lead to a surge in fundraising for both parties. But Democrats tried and failed to change the filibuster earlier this year to pass a voting rights bill, and there's no reason to think such an effort could succeed now. That is now the central choice in the 2022 election.” Still, the operative cautioned, Democrats would need to be careful in some swing districts to refrain from alienating voters with moderate views on abortion. Stopping his reelection became the single biggest reason Democrats turned out in 2020, and they will have similar impact on the midterms,” Richard Luchette, a Democratic strategist, said. The bombshell revelation on Monday night that the Supreme Court is preparing to strike down Roe v.

In those states intent on banning abortion, legislators are also passing or proposing laws which ban or criminalize those who seek to help women obtain ...

The next battle will be over the information and the means provided to get women from the abortion banning states to the abortion providing states. Will local authorities hack into the computers of women and arrest those searching for information about abortions in other states or about medication abortions? Will state police force women of child-bearing age to have a pregnancy test before boarding a plane to Maryland, New York, or any other state where abortion is legal? In post-Roe America, the most difficult part for women seeking abortions is not likely to be money or even geography—it is likely to be information. Non-profit organizations like Planned Parenthood that serve, in part, low-income women will be in substantial legal jeopardy if they give out information about how to get an abortion out of state. Beginning with the Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks and continuing with the Texas law that bans abortions after 6 weeks, states have rushed to enact copycat laws that include either a 6 week ban or a 15 week ban along with penalties for abortion providers and for those who provide information on abortion. In those states intent on banning abortion, legislators are also passing or proposing laws which ban or criminalize those who seek to help women obtain abortions. It is clear that some states are preparing to be abortion providers to more women than just those in their state. First, access to information is easier for those with financial means and those who are better educated. California passed a major law protecting the privacy of women wanting abortions and addressing racial and economic inequities in access by providing abortion coverage under Medicaid. Washington state passed a law prohibiting legal action against those who seek abortion and those who help them. They are rapidly dividing into two camps—states that will ban all or most abortions and states that are codifying reproductive health protections and preparing for an influx of women seeking abortions. Finally, there are other states such as Michigan that have laws on the books banning abortion that pre-dated the Roe v.

A leaked Supreme Court draft opinion prompted calls from abroad to protect women's rights in the United States and around the world.

Wade, according to a leaked draft of the opinion published by Politico and confirmed by Chief Justice Roberts. How might the fall of Roe v. Abortion is one of the most polarizing issues in U.S. politics. A spokesman for British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told reporters the matter was up to the U.S. justice system. “We’ll never back down from protecting and promoting women’s rights in Canada and around the world.” LONDON — Leaders around the world expressed alarm Tuesday at the prospect of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v.

Leaks of any kind are rare at the Supreme Court, but in 1973, the original Roe decision was leaked to the press before the court formally announced it.

Then-Chief Justice Warren Burger was reportedly furious about the leak, demanding a meeting with Time's editors to tell them off. But the ruling was slightly delayed, and that week's magazine ended up hitting newsstands a few hours too soon. There have indeed been leaks at the court before, albeit of a different scale. Leaks of any kind are rare at the Supreme Court, and Totenberg says there hasn't been such a massive breach in modern history. While such a ruling would have enormous consequences, legal experts and onlookers alike are also struck by how the draft opinion made its way into public view in the first place. Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the document in a statement on Tuesday morning, but says it does not represent the court's final position.

Leaks of any kind are rare at the Supreme Court, but in 1973, the original Roe decision was leaked to the press before the court formally announced it.

Then-Chief Justice Warren Burger was reportedly furious about the leak, demanding a meeting with Time's editors to tell them off. But the ruling was slightly delayed, and that week's magazine ended up hitting newsstands a few hours too soon. There have indeed been leaks at the court before, albeit of a different scale. Leaks of any kind are rare at the Supreme Court, and Totenberg says there hasn't been such a massive breach in modern history. While such a ruling would have enormous consequences, legal experts and onlookers alike are also struck by how the draft opinion made its way into public view in the first place. Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the document in a statement on Tuesday morning, but says it does not represent the court's final position.

People of color and other marginalized, low-income people will be most affected by an overturning of landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade, health and policy ...

Supreme Court opinion drafts are subject to change, and are part of the high court's deliberative process. “It is very concerning, and very alarming and would devastate access for many millions of women in the United States,” she said. “There are some medical conditions in which a pregnancy is very, very dangerous to the mother." “As a family medicine physician, I see this firsthand in my patients’ stories and lived experiences.” And they may not have time off work, access to child care, the things they need to be able … to leave their community to get constitutionally protected health care.” In the draft opinion, Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote, "We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled."

A draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito suggests that a majority of the court may overturn the landmark 1973 ruling that guaranteed the ...

To be clear, this is not what would happen should the Supreme Court overturn Roe – rather, it would allow states to implement bans based on the ending of a constitutionally guaranteed right to abortion. How much of this change in the experiences of American women is due to Roe? And if it is overturned, will the trends be reversed? The reason women opt to terminate a pregnancy varies. As Shehan notes: “With the availability of a greater range of contraception and abortion drugs other than medical procedures available today, along with a strong demand for women’s labor in the U.S. economy, it seems unlikely that women’s status will ever go back to where it was before 1973. Amanda Stevenson, a sociologist at University of Colorado Boulder, looked into what would happen should the U.S. ends all abortions nationwide. “Women living in poverty have a rate of unintended pregnancy five times higher than those with middle or high incomes. In 1970, the “average age at first marriage for women in the U.S. was just under 21. The opinion is due to be issued later in the year. Although a seismic development in the long-running legal battle and social debate over abortion rights, the development is not entirely unexpected. As an obstetrician/gynecologist, Ireland does, however, hear on a daily basis stories from women who opt for an abortion. Constance Shehan, a sociologist at the University of Florida, provides a snapshot of life for women prior to the landmark case. A leaked draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito suggests the Supreme Court is on the brink of overturning two rulings, including Roe v.

Abortion rights represent the “third rail” of social justice issues now facing corporate leaders. getty. The possibility that the seminal abortion rights ...

All of this is to suggest that corporate leadership should anticipate the potential need to fully engage on the combustible question of abortion rights and its implications for its business and stakeholders. A fourth concern must be the reaction of state and local government to any public position taken by the corporation on the abortion rights issue. In a state where government has taken a forceful position on the issue-whether for or against abortion rights-will a contrary position expose the corporation to some form of reprisal that carriers economic or reputational harm? Will the importance they attribute to abortion rights cause them to influence corporate decision-making on the topic? At the top of the list must be the perception of the company’s consumers and related stakeholders. Yelp, for example, has offered to cover expenses for its employees and their spouses who must travel out of state for abortion access.

It may hyper-charge America's culture wars in an election year - how will Congress and voters react?

Initial views are expressed in a non-binding vote shortly after a case is presented to the court, draft majority and dissenting opinions are circulated and changes are made. It is a practice that speaks to the court's unrivalled power to interpret, uphold or strike down any law Congress passes and establish or dismantle individual rights at the stroke of a pen. He ordered an investigation into the origins of the leak - but the damage has been done. Never in modern US history has a draft Supreme Court opinion been leaked to the public. Only the nine judges and their handful of clerks - law school graduates selected for their achievements and intellect - are privy to the machinations of the Supreme Court's judicial process. The side that prevails in November could have a blank slate for determining the fate of abortion for their citizens. The justice opined that the former were much more secure than the latter, which need to be strongly rooted in US history and tradition. The abortion fight could simply shift from the courts to the state legislatures, keeping US politics much as they are today. But in others - like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin - the fate of the procedure will depend on whether pro-choice Democratic governors win re-election or are defeated. Because of Senate rules that several Democrats (including Mr Manchin) are adamantly against altering, passage would have required 60 votes out of the 100 senators - a mark the abortion bill did not approach. If they were in the Senate, they could talk about what kind of judges they would want on the courts. They could support or oppose policies that affected abortion on the margins of the constitutional rights afforded by Roe. They could speculate on what they might do if Roe were struck down.

The Supreme Court is set to overturn Roe v. Wade, according to a leaked draft opinion published by Politico.

A second abortion-rights advocacy group, the Guttmacher Institute, counted 26 states considered certain or likely to ban abortion, based on laws passed before and after Roe in the event it was overturned. "The work of the Court will not be affected in any way." “Last night’s stunning breach was an attack on the independence of the Supreme Court,” McConnell wrote. Wade a calculated plan to “intimidate” the justices. "What is clear is that opponents of Roe want to punish women and take away their rights to make decisions about their own bodies," said Harris, the first female vice president. "Politicians will hear them loud and clear at the ballot box this November." "And the idea we’re letting the states make those decisions … would be a fundamental shift in what we’ve done." But it’s not about filibuster, size of the court or what the Senate hasn’t passed. Newsom’s office said their goal is put the amendment on the ballot this November. Lawmakers will have to act quickly to make that happen. But the court stressed that the draft did not represent the final opinion of any member or the full court. As reported by The Atlantic, some people have also pro-actively attained abortion pills in preparation for a potential repeal of Roe v Wade. President Joe Biden issued a statement Tuesday saying "a woman's right to choose is fundamental" and his administration "will be ready when any ruling is issued."

Supporters and opponents of abortion rights were anticipating a Supreme Court decision this summer, but the sudden release of a draft opinion set off a wave ...

“We do know that this is an issue that charges up our base,” she said. She was cautiously in favor of a rollback of Roe v. “And after how many years of having the right to an abortion with Roe v. “Now that that choice could be stripped away, it’s scary.” “It’s pretty longstanding and it has had a lot of support.” In Lake Charles, La., Yvette Clark, 61, was trying to sort through what the leaked ruling would actually mean politically and for women in her state. In South Jordan, Utah, Mary Taylor, the leader of Pro-Life Utah, threw her phone across the room in excitement when a friend called her with the news. Opponents and supporters of abortion rights had expected for months that the Supreme Court would vote to overturn Roe v. “I hope today that number is zero.” Wade will be overturned made her see the Supreme Court as “tyrannical.” “We need to keep introducing bills about abolition across the country. And I just kept thanking the Lord for these innocent babies’ lives that are being saved.”

A draft opinion published by Politico suggests that earlier this year a majority of Supreme Court justices supported overturning the 1973 case Roe v.

You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.

The Supreme Court will likely overturn Roe v. Wade and give states the freedom to outlaw abortion, according to a draft opinion reported by Politico, ...

The Supreme Court is now weighing a case on Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban and whether states can restrict abortion even before a fetus is viable. The court has not formally released its opinion yet and the final version could change from what was leaked, with a final decision likely released in June. The ruling comes as many GOP-led states had already been enacting abortion bans ahead of the court’s ruling, ranging from 15-week bans passed in Florida and Arizona to Oklahoma passing three abortion bans in the span of a month and making performing the procedure a felony. Polling has consistently found a majority of Americans support legal access to abortion and don’t want Roe to be overturned. The House has already passed a bill that would codify abortion rights into law and President Joe Biden called for its passage in the Senate Tuesday, but it remains unlikely to get enough support in the chamber to get through. The Supreme Court will likely overturn Roe v. Congressional Republicans, meanwhile, have already been working with anti-abortion rights activists on legislation that would ban abortion nationwide as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, the Washington Post reported Monday, which they’re likely to introduce should the GOP regain control of Congress in November.

A bombshell report suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be about to overturn Roe v. Wade, which protects the constitutional right to abortion.

The draft opinion suggests that the court’s strengthened conservative majority is ready to go even further by overturning Roe v. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” says the draft opinion, which was written by Justice Samuel Alito and has at least preliminary support from four other Republican-appointed justices, according to Politico. “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.” Disclosure of the draft opinion marks an extraordinary breach of protocol for an institution that has long prided itself for being almost leak-proof. The decision could clear the way for prohibitions in much of the U.S.

Leaks of any kind are rare at the Supreme Court, but in 1973, the original Roe decision was leaked to the press before the court formally announced it.

Then-Chief Justice Warren Burger was reportedly furious about the leak, demanding a meeting with Time's editors to tell them off. But the ruling was slightly delayed, and that week's magazine ended up hitting newsstands a few hours too soon. There have indeed been leaks at the court before, albeit of a different scale. Leaks of any kind are rare at the Supreme Court, and Totenberg says there hasn't been such a massive breach in modern history. While such a ruling would have enormous consequences, legal experts and onlookers alike are also struck by how the draft opinion made its way into public view in the first place. Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the document in a statement on Tuesday morning, but says it does not represent the court's final position.

A draft Supreme Court decision, which is not expected to be finalized for another month or more and could change in its final form, would leave it to ...

According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, a group that fights abortion restrictions in court and closely tracks state laws, 24 states are likely to ban abortion if they are allowed. Governors and state legislators reacted with a mix of alarm and celebration after a leaked draft opinion suggested that the Supreme Court had voted to overturn Roe v. “I’ll con’t to ensure that TX protects the unborn & pray for the end of abortion across our nation,” he wrote on Twitter. The 5-4 decision upheld a federal law banning a method of abortion known by opponents of the procedure as “partial birth,” reversing course from a decision to strike down a similar state law seven years earlier in Stenberg v. Wade. “We pray for the resolve of our Justices and for a decision that protects our most basic and precious right, the right to life.” Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the case before the nation’s highest court on a restrictive Mississippi law, could be the most consequential on women’s access to abortion since the court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. “If the court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose,” Mr. Biden said in a written statement. In the third, it allowed states to ban abortions so long as exceptions were made to protect the life and health of the mother. He called it “a clearly coordinated campaign to intimidate and obstruct the justices of the United States Supreme Court.” The F.D.A. had initially approved the use of mifepristone, the first of a two-pill regimen to terminate a pregnancy, in 2000, but required it to be provided in person. “If the court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose,” Mr. Biden said in a written statement. Medication abortion is the new front in the nation’s five-decade-long fight, as both sides anticipate that by summer the Supreme Court could overturn or pare back the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v.

If Alito's opinion prevails, abortion will be immediately illegal in the 18 states that currently have total or near-total abortion bans already on the books.

Once again, the study authors suggest that having access to birth control such as the pill allows women to delay having children, which means they can invest more in their education and choosing an occupation. It seems unlikely contraception would be included if the state weren’t bracing for the possibility that the U.S. Supreme Court could overturn access to birth control as well. They write, “The ratio of women relative to men in professional programs began its rapid ascent in 1970, just as the first pill cohorts graduated from college.” These economists say there is another factor that also likely influenced these advances for women—access to abortion. Raskin is not alone in believing that access to birth control is in jeopardy, others are weighing in as well. The wording of Alito’s opinion has some experts worried that access to contraception could also be restricted in the future. Instead, Alito’s rationale for overturning Roe stems from the fact that abortion isn’t mentioned in the Constitution. “The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision,” Alito writes.

A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion suggests the nation's highest court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that guarantees the ...

There is a paper that actually compares outcomes for people who were forced to carry their pregnancy to term with the people who got an abortion and were able to have kids later on. Most of them weren’t. But the person decided to carry that pregnancy to term, and the economic outcomes were better for that child, and the emotional outcomes were better as well. It looked at “What is the impact of having access to abortion on people’s health and well-being?” And what we see is very large health burdens, greater health risks for people who carry pregnancies to term. But the vast majority of them had the baby because there were very few places that would do abortions. We see economic hardship for people who had a child before they were ready, and we measure that through self-reported living in poverty—their income relative to household size—and we can also see it when we look at their credit reports. It’s not that they’re different people having kids; it’s that people have to be able to have kids when they’re ready. Many people who have abortions want to have children later, under better circumstances. The Turnaway Study followed people who sought abortions—some who got their wanted abortion and some who were too far along and were denied. And the idea that [Roe v. But the fact that it’s leaked is shocking, unprecedented. The study found that women denied the procedure were more likely to experience negative health impacts—including worse mental health—than women who received one. Wade, the landmark ruling that guarantees the right to an abortion.

Newly leaked documents appear to show that the U.S. Supreme Court will likely overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision that legalized abortion ...

Clinics in neighboring states are already preparing for a surge in patients from states that limit access to abortion. Twenty-six states are expected to ban or restrict access to abortion if Roe v. “Abortion restrictions create impossible hurdles that nobody should have to overcome in order to get essential healthcare. The case will head back to a district court for proceedings. But it really depends on how the U.S. Supreme Court decision comes out and exactly what the court holds,” said Jared Carter, an assistant professor of law at Vermont Law School and expert in First Amendment law. During the initial arguments in December, Mississippi’s attorney general asked the court to either undo Roe v. Wade were to be undone. Wade, the landmark decision that legalized abortion access nationwide. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case challenging Mississippi’s 15-week ban against most abortions. Wade. The opinion was written by Justice Samuel Alito. - Clinics in neighboring states are preparing for a surge in patients from states that limit access to abortion. - Twenty-six states are expected to ban or restrict access to abortion if Roe v.

The Supreme Court's initial draft opinion has spurred many questions, from what this means for people seeking abortions right now to what comes next.

The overturning of Roe would almost immediately lead to stricter limits on abortion access in large parts of the South and Midwest, with about half of the states set to immediately impose broad abortion bans. They’re confronting the same problems that have stymied much of their agenda for the last year and a half: slim majorities and a lack of votes to change Senate rules. If Roberts is on the fence or in a more centrist position, he could try to sway another conservative to his view, wresting the majority from Alito. But should the court’s vote hold, federal protections for abortion rights will end, and states poised to repeal such rights will have a freer path to do so. States that do want to protect abortion rights will still have that opportunity. But this is the first time in modern history that the public has seen a Supreme Court draft decision while a case was still pending.

Welcome to FiveThirtyEight's politics chat. The transcript below has been lightly edited. sarah (Sarah Frostenson, politics editor): It's possible that Roe ...

In the 1970s, for instance, they struck down the death penalty, only to allow states to use it again after a backlash. For abortion to make a big difference in the election, you’d need to see other groups of voters shifting back toward Democrats on this issue. What are the potential consequences of this, especially as it pertains to the legitimacy of the court? According to a December poll from the Associated Press/NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, 13 percent of Democrats named abortion or reproductive rights as one of the issues they wanted Congress to address in 2022. Dare I say it, I ultimately think this isn’t going to be something that Democratic politicians feel a lot of pressure around until abortion rights are actually gone in half the country and people start to see what that means. On the one hand, some polling suggests that protecting abortion rights is a priority for Democrats in particular. That hasn’t become law yet, but I imagine we’ll see a lot more of those types of measures if Roe is gone — especially if more women are turning to the internet to get abortion pills. The only scenario where I could see Democrats passing a pro-abortion bill is if, in 2023, they somehow hold the House and pick up seats in the Senate. If they win, say, 52 seats, the votes could be there to abolish the filibuster. This means that if the court were to overturn Roe, they would be out of step with public opinion. But regardless of whether this opinion is final, the court deciding to overturn Roe this term has always been a distinct possibility. What kinds of fights should we expect to see play out in the states ( or are already playing out)? In Congress? (Chief Justice John Roberts said in a statement Tuesday that the draft was authentic, but that it “does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member.”)

Full coverage of the leaked draft of the Supreme Court opinion, indicating the 1973 precedent may be overturned.

The authenticity of the draft, dated from February, was confirmed by Chief Justice Roberts, but he said it was not necessarily the final resolution in the case. The draft opinion was published Monday evening by Politico, which it said was written by Justice Samuel Alito and was the opinion of the court, implying a majority supported it. "From a pure criminal investigative standpoint, I'm not sure I am aware of what a criminal charge would look like in this instance."

In a stunning breach of Supreme Court confidentiality and secrecy, Politico has obtained what it calls a draft of a majority opinion written by Justice ...

The court said that a regulation cannot place an "undue burden" on the right to abortion, which is defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability." In the opinion, Alito also addresses the fact that Roe has been on the books for some 50 years. Casey. A majority of the court in that case replaced Roe's framework with a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions. Abortion is your right -- and it is STILL LEGAL," Planned Parenthood said in a tweet Under normal procedure, by the end of that week the justices would have met in their private conference to take a preliminary vote on the issue. At oral arguments, Roberts was the only one of the six Republican appointees who signaled interest in exploring a narrower opinion that would have upheld Mississippi's law but preserved some protections for abortion rights. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision," Alito wrote. In the past, justices have changed their votes and sometimes a majority opinion ultimately becomes a dissent. The opinion would be the most consequential abortion decision in decades and transform the landscape of women's reproductive health in America. Roberts is willing, however, to uphold the Mississippi law that would ban abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy, CNN has learned. Politico's publishing of the draft is unprecedented by the high court's standards of secrecy. The opinion in this case is not expected to be published until late June.

A majority of the court privately voted to strike down the landmark abortion rights decision, according to the document, obtained by Politico.

In the language of the court, it has been a precedent that cemented the basic rights of women to have access to a legal abortion. The draft opinion makes familiar arguments against Roe. It says that the Constitution is silent about abortion and that nothing in its text or structure supports a constitutional right to abortion. “After ringing these alarms for years now, it’s time to break the glass,” she wrote in a statement. The leak of the draft opinion sent a jolt through Washington Monday night. And the restrictions in state legislatures means that practically speaking, abortion is already difficult if not impossible to access in a wide swath of the country stretching from Florida to Idaho. And early drafts of opinions often change by the time the decision from the court is announced. Abortion has long split the two parties — and the country — though it had receded as a central issue in presidential elections even while remaining a galvanizing issue for many. It also could be intended to soften the blow by signaling to everyone the earthquake to come.” In 1979, aides to Chief Justice Warren E. Burger conducted an investigation to determine the source of a report on how the court planned to rule on a case involving public figures who sue journalists. In California, where abortion rights are protected by a right to privacy that is written into the state constitution, legal scholars predicted that access to the procedure will remain unchanged. Anti-abortion groups are cautiously optimistic that the leaked opinion means their nearly 50-year dream of overturning Roe is actually about to become reality. It is the kind of explosive story that the president’s advisers are likely to take some time to review before having Mr. Biden weigh in.

Members of the Supreme Court have agreed to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which guaranteed abortion rights nationwide, according to an apparently ...

The high court is deliberating on abortion as many Republican-led states seek to limit access to the procedure. Casey—a 1992 case that altered Roe but upheld abortion rights—“must be overruled,” arguing the Constitution doesn’t guarantee a right to abortion access and individual states can decide on their own whether to permit the procedure. Wade decision, which guaranteed abortion rights nationwide, according to an apparently leaked draft opinion obtained by Politico on Monday—potentially upending decades of legal precedent as many states seek to restrict or cut off access to abortion.

A leaked initial draft majority opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court will vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide, ...

A ruling is only final when it is published by the court. The Roe v. If Roe is overturned, abortion is likely to remain legal in liberal states. Reuters was not able to confirm the authenticity of the draft. Stay strong," he said in a Twitter post. Wade decision that allowed abortions performed before a fetus would be viable outside the womb - between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy - was wrongly decided because the U.S. Constitution makes no specific mention of abortion rights. More than a dozen states currently have laws protecting abortion rights. It is then circulated among the justices. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a leaked initial draft majority opinion published by Politico on Monday. "Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Supreme Court and the White House declined to comment. WASHINGTON, May 2 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court looks set to vote to overturn the Roe v.

In an unprecedented revelation, a document written by Justice Samuel Alito says 'Roe was egregiously wrong from the start'

“I am horrified by the apparent draft supreme court opinion leaked this evening … this should not be the supreme court’s final opinion when it comes to abortion rights,” said New York governor Kathy Hochul in a statement. Naral Pro-Choice America’s president Mini Timmaraju called it “the most ominous and alarming sign yet that our nation’s highest court is poised to overturn Roe v Wade”. Republican senator Tom Cotton condemned the apparent leak but applauded the vote, saying: “The Supreme Court & the DOJ must get to the bottom of this leak immediately using every investigative tool necessary. Alito said the court can’t predict how the public might react and shouldn’t try. After the Politico story broke, footage posted to social media showed a crowd of protesters gathering outside the supreme court late on Monday night, waving signs and chanting “my body, my choice.” Neal Katyal, a former US acting solicitor general who has argued many cases before the supreme court, tweeted: “I’ve quickly scanned the draft opinion and it appears legitimate. But if, as expected, it is adopted, the decision would rule in favour of Mississippi in a highly consequential case about that state’s attempt to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The draft opinion runs 98 pages, including a 31-page appendix of historical state abortion laws, and includes 118 footnotes. The justice adds: “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.” It is then circulated among the justices. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences.

A draft opinion published by Politico suggests that earlier this year a majority of Supreme Court justices supported overturning the 1973 case Roe v.

You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.

Some commentators have claimed that the leak of Justice Samuel Alito's draft abortion opinion is unprecedented. But the original ruling in Roe v.

It may prove to be a major blow to the court’s legitimacy and reputation. While it may be the case, as Politico states, that “no draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending,” it is not true that rulings have never been given to journalists before the announcement of the decision by the court. Burger sent a frantic “eyes only” letter to all the justices demanding that the leaker be identified and punished. There are obvious and profound consequences if litigants and the public are tipped off to the result in a case before it has been formally announced and adopted. Hammond confided in an acquaintance he knew from the University of Texas School of Law that the Roe ruling was forthcoming. Casey has been greeted with astonishment about not only the sweep of the ruling but also the fact that a draft opinion was leaked at all.

A leaked draft opinion suggests the Supreme Court may overturn Roe v. Wade, limiting abortion access. Experts say it could affect birth control, ...

"And if there is no basis in the constitution for the right to abortion, then there's no basis for the right to use contraception." The right to privacy at stake in this decision is "actually a fundamentally American idea," Bae said. And in 1972, the court extended that right to non-married people, as well, in the decision on Eisenstadt v. They could go as far as subjecting people to "rigid and coercive regulation to make sure that a fetus is born, no matter the consequences to the woman," she explained. In fact, the legal right to access contraception via the right to privacy predates Roe v. "It really undermines the harmony and ecosystem where women have the power to choose their reproductive options." That can include the right to same-sex marriage and interracial marriage, as well as the right to decide certain aspects of your child's education, Bae said. Wade and eliminating the right to abortion access opens up the door to dismantling other rights that have previously been protected under that implied right to privacy. Despite assurances in the draft opinion that its implications won’t go beyond abortion, "(the draft opinion) can't be limited to abortion," Wendy Mariner, professor of health law, bioethics and human rights at Boston University School of Public Health, told TODAY said. The right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the constitution, she explained, but it's something that's been codified in decisions over and over again for the last several decades. But experts say the effects of such a decision likely won't be limited to abortion access — and birth control may be next. But experts say there is good reason to be concerned about what the decision may mean for access to all kinds of reproductive health care in the near future.

Few said if or how how they'll protect employees' reproductive health care needs.

We believe they need more health care in the future, not less. We’ve made out-of-state care accessible and affordable for employees in states that have instituted more restrictive laws.” Similarly, few companies responded to Fortune’s request for comment last September when Texas’ law went into effect. Did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment. The amendment was the starting point for additional legislation wearing down the power of Roe vs. Did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment. But I sense that companies are regrouping and thinking.” And Amazon announced plans to help employees access the reproductive health care they need, just hours before the Supreme Court draft decision leaked. Austin-based Bumble and Match Group, which owns a slate of dating apps, said that it would establish funds to help employees affected by Texas’ law. Farrell notes that companies have already expanded contraceptive coverage and abortion-related resources in response to existing restrictive state legislation, like Texas’ so-called Heartbeat Bill, which passed last year. Sixteen states, along with Washington D.C., have laws in place protecting reproductive rights, including abortion access, according to the organization. Late Monday night, Politico reported that the Supreme Court has voted to overturn Roe v.

A woman's right to have an abortion through the first trimester of pregnancy was protected nationally in 1973 following the supreme court's landmark ruling.

All these are factors the woman and her responsible physician necessarily will consider in consultation.” These interests are separate and distinct.” Five Republican-nominated judges were among the majority. “This right of privacy ... is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. “Specific and direct harm medically diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be involved. There is also the distress, for all concerned, associated with the unwanted child, and there is the problem of bringing a child into a family already unable, psychologically and otherwise, to care for it.

The nationwide legal right to abortion is described as "egregiously wrong" in a leaked document.

You can also get in touch in the following ways: Assume for a moment that this draft opinion becomes the law of the land. The other three were picked by Democratic presidents. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. Roe v Wade in 1973 gave women in the US an absolute right to an abortion in the first three months of pregnancy, and limited rights in the second trimester. The US Supreme Court could be about to overturn the nationwide legal right to abortion, according to an unprecedented leaked draft of a court document.

Politico said it obtained a draft Supreme Court majority opinion indicating the landmark abortion ruling will be overturned.

But based on the oral arguments of the case in December, she said it wasn’t surprising to see several of the justices endorsing this full-throated rejection of Roe v. “And if Democrats cannot use that to their advantage in this election cycle, something’s broken.” According to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion advocacy research group, that would mean the average Texan would have to drive 525 miles, each way, to obtain an abortion. University of Texas law professor Liz Sepper also cautioned against certainty in the wake of the leak, reiterating that this draft, dated Feb. 10, may not reflect the current or final opinion of the court. Casey. Then he changed his mind, and the court voted to uphold the ruling. She said it’s critical for people to realize that this is not a final ruling. “That’s what we’re concerned about, and [we] won’t fully celebrate until we see the final opinion actually released.” “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” the draft obtained by Politico reads. But with this Mississippi case, the court and its new conservative majority agreed to reconsider the precedent set by Roe v. The state has banned abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy through a unique civil enforcement mechanism that has, so far, withstood judicial review. Since the 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, reversing nearly 50 years of constitutional protection for abortion, and let states set their own restrictions on the procedure.

The Mountain West is as divided on abortion as the nation, itself. States like Colorado have passed legislation to preserve access to abortion, ...

Abortion access in Nevada and New Mexico is not likely to be affected if Roe v. That legislation states, “Colorado was the first state to decriminalize abortion care in an overwhelmingly bipartisan effort in 1967, well before the Supreme Court affirmed the right to abortion care nationwide in Roe v. That laws states anyone providing abortion in the state could be imprisoned for two to five years unless it was a life-saving measure. Funding for the Mountain West News Bureau is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Colorado has affirmed abortion access in that state. An Idaho law passed in 2020 would trigger an abortion ban there if Roe v.

The US Supreme Court is set to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade judgment that legalised abortion in the country, according to a report in Politico.

Wade in the 1970s; and, most recently, CBS’s Jan Crawford’s report in 2012 that “Chief Justice Roberts voted to strike down the heart of the Affordable Care Act before changing his mind and siding with the court’s liberal bloc”. All of which is to say: Supreme Court leaks are rare and remarkable, but they are not unprecedented. This law too was blocked by a district judge, and in February 2020, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans agreed with the decision. I’ve done some research on this, and I’m just sharing for anyone who might be interested in this wider context.” The court’s “recorded history of leaks dates back to mid-19th century. Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company’, the outcome of which was reported by the New York Tribune “ten days before the Court handed down its decision”; leaks about Roe v. The draft includes a notation that it was circulated among the justices on February 10, the Politico report said. Bryant challenged the opponents of the law to sue: “If they do not believe in the sanctity of life, these that are in organisations like Planned Parenthood, we will have to fight that fight. Liberal commentators have predicted “seismic” changes in American society if Roe were to be overturned. But it is worth it,” The Associated Press reported at the time. Experts now agree that advances in medicine have brought the threshold down to 23 or 24 weeks (6 months or a little less). Jackson Women’s Health Organisation’, popularly known as the “Mississippi case”.

Legal experts said Roe granted not only a constitutional right to abortion, but also provided access to safe abortion care. The Supreme Court plans to strike ...

“There are other constitutional rights that have flown from Roe and Casey, including the right to marry anyone you choose.” There are other constitutional rights that have flown from Roe and Casey, including the right to marry anyone you choose. Before that point, the patient’s right to privacy—and the right to terminate their pregnancy—was of first importance. The Casey ruling amended parts of the Roe decision to remove the trimester distinction and placed more restrictions on abortion care. Casey was a follow-up case to Roe v. Currently, the Supreme Court draft does not change people’s access to abortion care. In 1973, the Roe v. Roe v. Abortions began long before the passing of Roe v. Wade also strove to protect the rights of a viable child. Protecting the right to abortion didn’t mean granting new access to abortions. A majority of Americans opposes overturning Roe v.

Should it stand, the court's ruling wouldn't ban abortion nationwide, but would leave the decision up to individual states. Many Republican-led states are ready ...

You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.

If the draft supreme court decision is not substantially altered it would result in 26 states banning the procedure.

Others, such as California, are working to build capacity for the thousands of woman who could suddenly find the nearest abortion clinic there. There, the state attorney general would need to certify the central holding of Roe was indeed struck down. The court’s finding in Roe invalidated dozens of state abortion bans, and made it illegal for states to outlaw abortion before viability. Enforcement of a six-week abortion ban in Iowa could go into effect. Even more doctors may be frightened to provide evidence-based care to women who face life-threatening complications, if their condition is not imminently emergent – but may become so. Medication abortion can safely end pregnancies up to 10 weeks gestation using a two-pill protocol. Some experts have estimated it could take between six months to two years for most cases to be settled. Until the court issues a final decision, the right to abortion is protected under federal law. All will probably be the subject of court challenges. The case that was the subject of the leak on Monday, called Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, considered a Mississippi law that banned abortion at 15 weeks. The president has endorsed such a change. Democrats broadly support abortion rights, while Republicans almost universally oppose efforts to protect abortion rights.

A reckoning with what the 14th amendment enshrines could affect consensual sex and even marriage rights.

The use of contraception gets in the way of that.” “The opinion doesn’t read like Roe was a wrongful tangent of the foundation” within the 14th Amendment, Parmet said. “Once you throw down the best-known decision in that category of cases, every single other case is now up for grabs.” (That’s partly because at the time of the framing, abortion was legal in the US before “quickening,” when the movements of a fetus are first felt.) Similarly, contraception is not mentioned specifically in the constitution, so strict interpretations of rights could exclude it. Justice Samuel Alito, in his draft decision, argues that Roe is a faulty law. Laws broadly banning abortion may also prohibit certain forms of birth control that opponents incorrectly say are working as abortion-causing medications.

The question to ask in a leak case is always, cui bono? Who benefits? The Court confirmed Tuesday that the leaked draft by Justice Samuel Alito is real, so we ...

With US abortion rights in jeopardy, Judy Chicago, Bonnie Greer, Rebecca Solnit and more explain why they are determined to fight back.

I was horrified when I heard the news, but not surprised; it was clear that a lot of the justices wanted to overturn Roe v Wade entirely. It’s not even a fealty to the idea that foetal life is particularly valuable. The 80% of the country that thought rather sensibly that this was a done deal, that this was a woman’s right under the constitution, will be galvanised and we will have a very different outcome at the election. I can’t believe that my past is becoming the present in the United States. This is the most powerful country in the world, and this fundamental right for pregnant people is being stripped away. The hope is that this will galvanise us at the polls, not just in 2024, but this coming fall. And there is also no accountability for the people impregnating women – which is because this is not about babies, it is about destroying women’s agency and autonomy. This MUST be a wakeup call, the alarm where we take to the streets and stay in the streets until this patriarchal madness ends. It is absurd for this country – with one of the highest maternal mortality rates and no paid maternity leave – to be forcing childbirth on women. I have been getting emails all day and night from women around the world who are panicked, raging, saying this cannot happen in the US, for if it does, it will catalyse and amplify the rightwing misogynist project that is taking away the rights of women everywhere, having a devastating impact on their lives and now escalated during the pandemic. The supreme court does not represent the majority of Americans – who support abortion – and it has no moral authority to control women’s bodies. It’s the story of pushing forward and pushing backwards. It’s the same thing as saying that a human being is not equal under the law based on the colour of their skin.

President Joe Biden has said “a woman's right to choose is fundamental” and that his administration “will be ready when any ruling is issued.”.

Should the Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade goes too far and would divide the country. The organization was founded by Julian Assange and works to publish news leaks provided by anonymous sources. “As a Catholic, I do not support abortion, however, we cannot have an outright ban,” Cuellar said. Research suggests the bans and restrictions would have manifold effects on maternal health. The Supreme Court confirmed Tuesday that the leaked draft published on Monday by Politico was "authentic," with Chief Justice John Roberts calling the leak an "egregious breach" of the court's trust. Senate Democrats on Tuesday took the first steps to consider a bill that would codify the abortion rights protections in Roe v. They can fly to another country. Many say they’ve already been given a preview of what could be to come in states like Texas. However, the bill appears to lack the required 60 votes. “I walked proudly into Planned Parenthood, and I make no apologies to anyone.” “We will not go backward,” she said.

By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, voters oppose overturning Roe v. Wade, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll conducted immediately after POLITICO ...

Only 25 percent of voters surveyed in the POLITICO/Morning Consult poll say abortion should be “legal in all cases,” though an additional 31 percent say it should be “legal in most cases.” Roughly a quarter, 24 percent, say abortion should be “illegal in most cases,” and only 11 percent say it should be “illegal in all cases.” But 54 percent of voters say they would support a 15-week abortion ban similar to the one the Supreme Court is weighing from Mississippi in their own state. By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, voters oppose overturning Roe v.

On Monday night, POLITICO published a leaked draft US Supreme Court opinion on the Mississippi case that would overturn Roe v. Wade.

The lesson is clear: If an abortion ban like the one in Mississippi becomes law, it will be catastrophic. These rights are recognized in international human rights treaties ratified by the United States. Recently, Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico have, by legislative changes or judicial rulings, either decriminalized abortion or loosened restrictions, better protecting women’s health and rights.

Shock waves continued to reverberate across the nation Wednesday in the wake of a leaked Supreme Court decision draft that threatens abortion rights.

One argument leveled against abortion in the court draft is that abortion rights are not enumerated in the Constitution, a circumstance that also could be applied to same-sex marriage and contraception, legal experts said. Wade. The poll, conducted last week, found 54% of Americans support upholding Roe, while 28% support overturning it. In California, a man calling himself the "Pro-Life Spiderman" was arrested after scaling San Francisco's 61-floor Salesforce Tower. There was no immediate word of any arrests, and it was the only violence reported among demonstrations nationwide. “It's a fundamental shift in American jurisprudence." Democrat leaders, including President Joe Biden, called on Congress to codify the landmark 1973 Roe v.

Justice Alito's careful draft opinion finally grasps the Constitutional nettle on abortion.

The question to ask in a leak case is always, cui bono? The leak of a draft majority opinion from the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. The Court’s response should be to go about its business as usual and not be intimidated.

Activist Heather Booth and the Jane Collective provided thousands of women with abortions before Roe v. Wade.

You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.

Why it matters: Patients experiencing early miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, or life-threatening medical conditions could also lose access to timely care, ...

Why it matters: The Supreme Court is considering a challenge to a Mississippi law that bans abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. But providers face the risk of a decade in prison. - "How someone determines what's life-saving or not would have to be adjudicated," Shah said. - Varsha Rao, the CEO of Nurx, which provides women's health services via telehealth, said that is certainly a concern among patients. - But that involves a drug used for medication abortion. But misunderstandings about that term without Roe's protections could result in improper care and obstruction to care, said Jessica Shepherd, chief medical officer at Verywell Health.

A bombshell report suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be about to overturn Roe v. Wade, which protects the constitutional right to abortion.

The abortion rate -- the number of procedures per 1,000 women of childbearing age -- fell 20% between 2011 and 2017, a drop the institute said had more to do with overall declines in pregnancies than with the rise in abortion restrictions. Wade were to be overturned, the abortion fight is likely to shift squarely to the pill. News of the draft ruling came one day ahead of primary voting in Ohio and Indiana. Overturning Roe could completely shake up midterm elections in November that were set to be a referendum on inflation, crime, immigration and Covid-19. The court is expected to rule by July in the case. In the Planned Parenthood v. That pill, approved in 2000, has failed to take off in the U.S. in the two decades that it has been on the market. Some two-thirds of women don’t even know medication abortion exists, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. That’s likely because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration imposed a labyrinth of restrictions on the drug, making it hard for a doctor to prescribe. Companies with operations in states that outlaw abortion might come under more pressure to help their employees access the reproductive care services they’ve been entitled to for half a century. According to the Guttmacher Institute, which researches sexual and reproductive health and rights globally, 26 states are “certain or likely” to ban abortion if Roe v. The draft opinion suggests that the court’s strengthened conservative majority is ready to go even further by overturning Roe v. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” says the draft opinion, which was written by Justice Samuel Alito and has at least preliminary support from four other Republican-appointed justices, according to Politico. “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.” Disclosure of the draft opinion marks an extraordinary breach of protocol for an institution that has long prided itself for being almost leak-proof. The decision could clear the way for prohibitions in much of the U.S. More than 20 already have abortion bans or restrictions on the books, ready to take effect should Roe’s protections be lifted.

Dozens of America's biggest companies did not respond for comment on the news widely perceived as an attack on women's reproductive rights.

Citing a leaked document, Politico reported earlier this week that the Supreme Court had decided to overturn Roe v. Few things are more important to women’s health and equality.” “The country is divided on abortion rights, and companies do not want to risk taking a position that could clash with anyone's religious beliefs,” he said. A spokesperson for Yelp told Fortune on Wednesday that overturning Roe v Wade would “jeopardize the human rights of millions of women who stand to lose the liberty to make decisions over their own bodies.” Branson said in a statement on Tuesday that he was deeply concerned by the potential withdrawal of abortion rights, saying he believed it to be “a personal choice that no government should interfere with.” Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg has warned that the overturning of Roe v Wade — the landmark ruling that granted women the constitutional right to have an abortion — would strip Americans of a fundamental right.