SINGAPORE — A High Court judge has revealed the names of six trainee lawyers who had cheated during the Bar exams, saying it is better for them "to face the ...
Sometimes, one might see an unforgiving face, but, I believe, more often than not, it will be a face that says, ‘Get up and try again; you can get it right’.” Justice Choo wrote: “But strong sentiments may sometimes interfere with the proper understanding of the idea of second chances. They were not named. However, he also warned that future cheats may not get off so lightly. SINGAPORE — A High Court judge has revealed the names of six trainee lawyers who had cheated during the Bar exams, saying it is better for them "to face the publicity than to hide from it”. This was after the judge previously redacted their names from his written judgement. SINGAPORE — A High Court judge has revealed the names of six trainee lawyers who had cheated during the Bar exams, saying it is better for them "to face the publicity than to hide from it”. This was after the judge previously redacted their names from his written judgement.
SINGAPORE — Seniors lawyers generally agreed that the trainee lawyers found to have cheated during their Bar examination must take responsibility for their ...
The latest decision has served to “quash speculations” on their identities. “If I ever meet them, I will say, ‘Look, the road to recovery and self-discovery starts with accepting (being named) and embracing your failings, which cannot be changed. and the lifting of the gag order has resulted in the whole country knowing their identity, I think that is quite harsh.” “The six applicants who aspire to be called as advocates and solicitors have to satisfy the Law Society that they are fit and proper persons.A statement by the Law Society of Singapore on the trainee lawyers who cheated in Bar examination” “The six applicants who aspire to be called as advocates and solicitors have to satisfy the Law Society that they are fit and proper persons.” It’s not just about being called to the Bar but the ability to look at people in the eyes and continue living a dignified life. In delivering his judgement on Wednesday, Justice Choo said that LawSoc now has a new responsibility of helping the six law graduates and he was sure that many LawSoc members are also “ready to lend a hand”. Mr Josephus Tan of Invictus Law said that “everybody deserves a second chance” and it is possible for the trainees to make amends. “If the public has that impression, and it affects the standing of the profession, then certainly, the people who have done (wrong) will have to take their medicine and their futures will get affected invariably,” Mr Tan added. Rather than naming the six publicly, Mr Silvester felt that a direction could have been made by the judge to have their applications to law firms supervised by the Law Society of Singapore (LawSoc) and to have the trainees declare that they were one of the six. Beyond that, it could lead to members of the public taking the view that other members of the Bar are similarly not to be trusted. The joint managing partner of TSMP Law Corporation added that it is “good for trust in the judicial system to have more transparency”.
The cheating first came to light earlier in April 2022. The law graduates had cheated in Part B of their Bar exams in 2020. Five of the students used WhatsApp ...
The AG had objected to admitting the six students to the Singapore Bar at an admission hearing. Five of the students used WhatsApp to share answers in six of the papers. A High Court judge in Singapore released the names of the six trainee lawyers who had cheated during the Bar exams.
SINGAPORE: The identities of the six trainee lawyers who cheated in the 2020 Bar exams have been disclosed after a High Court judge on Wednesday (Apr 27) ...
"The six applicants who aspire to be called as advocates and solicitors have to satisfy the Law Society that they are fit and proper persons. Sometimes one might see an unforgiving face, but, I believe, more often than not, it will be a face that says, 'Get up and try again; you can get it right'." But it would also be harsh to have one's professional career ended before it has even begun," said the judge last week. Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement
This followed an application by the Attorney-General for the judge to rescind his earlier order. . Read more at straitstimes.com.
"But strong sentiments may sometimes interfere with the proper understanding of the idea of second chances. “Whenever names of wrongdoers are redacted, or files sealed from public view, it invites speculation and suspicion. “The six applicants are not members of the Bar, and are not members of the Law Society,” said Mr Tan, adding that the society does not have statutory power to take further action against the six applicants. They were disciplined by Sile and required to disclose the disciplinary actions during their admission proceedings. The application was supported by the Law Society. “For the record, the Law Society did not give its consent to the admission of the six applicants to the Bar.
Three Indian-origin trainee lawyers are among six persons who cheated in the 2020 Bar Exams in Singapore, according to a media report on Wednesday.
Justice Choo added, "Strong sentiments may sometimes interfere with the proper understanding of the idea of second chances." After the initial revelation of the six applicants, the Attorney-General's Chambers said the Attorney-General was considering the applications of another five trainees who cheated. But it would also be harsh to have one's professional career ended before it has even begun," said the judge last week.
The names of six trainee lawyers who were found to have cheated while taking their Singapore Bar examinations are allowed to be publicly revealed.
You can select 'Manage settings' for more information and to manage your choices. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Your Privacy Controls. Find out more about how we use your information in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. Click here to find out more about our partners. - Information about your device and internet connection, including your IP address
SINGAPORE: At least one of the six trainee lawyers who cheated in the 2020 Bar examinations is still employed by a law firm, according to checks by CNA.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement
SINGAPORE — After Justice Choo Han Teck redacted the names of six trainee lawyers who had cheated during the Bar exams in his written judgement on April 18, ...
More often, they include vulnerable persons, such as minors and victims of sexual assault cases. In fact, there were strong reasons for upholding this principle of open justice. SINGAPORE — After Justice Choo Han Teck redacted the names of six trainee lawyers who had cheated during the Bar exams in his written judgement on April 18, the Attorney-General (AG) filed a request to reveal them.
The principle of open justice is a fundamental principle in open court proceedings, the AGC spokesman said. . Read more at straitstimes.com.
"Hence, the public has a right to know who he/she is and why the High Court considers him/her to be a fit and proper person to be called to the Bar," said the spokesman. She stressed that the principle of open justice is a fundamental principle in open court proceedings. She added that an admission hearing is a public acknowledgement by the High Court that a qualified person is a fit and proper person to be called to the Bar and to serve the public.
Those who cheated are neither lawyers nor members of the Law Society, he said. . Read more at straitstimes.com.
He said: "In general, what this saga reveals is that there are commentators who are quick to condemn lawyers, based on the conduct of non-lawyers... Accusations that the society agreed to redact, or conceal, the names of the six people are flatly wrong, Mr Tan said, adding that when the names were first redacted, the Law Society made submissions in Court to overturn that order. We guard ourselves, and we also check on each other, as colleagues and opponents.
SINGAPORE: Law Society president Adrian Tan has hit out at those who criticised the professional body for turning a blind eye to exam cheating, saying these ...
“The Law Society believes in open justice. It is unfair to target those law firms," Mr Tan wrote. It is because these six persons cheated that the Law Society did not agree to admit them as advocates and solicitors." "They do so without understanding the background of events or waiting for matters to be resolved. Advertisement Advertisement
Singapore High Court Judge Choo Han Teck on Wednesday rescinded an order to have their names redacted, the Channel News Asia reported.
After the initial revelation of the six applicants, the Attorney-General’s Chambers said the Attorney-General was considering the applications of another five trainees who cheated. Five of the trainee lawyers shared answers for six of the exam papers through WhatsApp, while the last one colluded with another candidate to cheat in three of the papers, according to the Channel report. In his initial judgment last week, Justice Choo said he would not name the six lawyers “in the hope that they will not be prejudiced in the long run" after they were found to have cheated in the exams.
SINGAPORE: The saga involving six trainee lawyers who cheated in the Bar examinations has sparked a spirited public debate about whether the candidates ...
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement “If a candidate is found to have cheated in the examination, the result will be nullified. Advertisement Those found to be in possession of their phones during the exam may be disqualified and/or barred from future exams.
SINGAPORE — Law Society president Adrian Tan has hit out at those who criticised the professional body for turning a blind eye to exam cheating, ...
“The Law Society believes in open justice. It is because these six persons cheated that the Law Society did not agree to admit them as advocates and solicitors." It is unfair to target those law firms," Mr Tan wrote. "They do so without understanding the background of events or waiting for matters to be resolved. Addressing commentators who criticised the Law Society for "somehow turning a blind eye to cheating", Mr Tan said: "These commentators are misguided. Mr Tan stressed that the six people who cheated have not been admitted to the Bar, which means they are not members of the Law Society and are not lawyers.