Johnny Depp's lawyers gave their opening statement in a $50 million defamation trial, saying Amber Heard faked abuse to advance her career.
“Ultimately this trial is about clearing Mr. Depp’s name of a terrible and false allegation.” “The article isn’t about Johnny Depp,” he argued. “The evidence will show that was a lie.” It’s up to you, ladies and gentlemen, to make him do that.” Her attorney, Elaine Bredehoft, went through many of the allegations in detail in her opening statement, including one occasion when Depp allegedly sexually assaulted her with a liquor bottle. Her attorney Ben Rottenborn argued that Depp is seeking to ruin Heard’s life by pursuing the lawsuit.
Actress' attorney makes explosive claim, which has never been made publicly before, at the former couple's defamation trial. Depp's lawyers called her “a ...
Depp’s lawyers plan to call a series of witnesses including police officers who responded to a May 2016 incident in Los Angeles. “The evidence will show that six days after Mr. Depp’s request for a divorce, and three days after Ms. Heard’s lawyer threatened Mr. Depp with claims of abuse if he did not agree to her financial demands, Ms. Heard arrived at the courthouse in Los Angeles, California, to file for a restraining order for domestic abuse,” Chew said. “I have always maintained a love for Johnny and it brings me great pain to have to live out the details of our past life together in front of the world.” In order for Depp to prevail in the Virginia case, the actor will have to prove that Heard’s abuse allegations are false and that Heard acted with malice or intentionally lied in making the claims. In the Virginia case, Depp claims he has lost movie roles including a lucrative Pirates of the Caribbean sequel appearance with a $40 million payday as a result of Heard’s op-ed. “It was not, ‘I’ll throw you a tweet.’ It was, ‘I’m putting my money where my mouth is.'” Heard has only donated about a quarter of that amount thus far through anonymous donors believed to include Elon Musk, who previously dated Heard. Depp’s legal strategy in the defamation trial hinges on bringing that disconnect before the jury. “In Mr. Depp’s fifty-eight years, not a single woman has ever accused him of violence, and nobody in Hollywood or the world had any reason to believe he was an abuser – until Ms. Heard publicly accused him.” But Depp’s lawyers, Ben Chew and Camille Vasquez, countered that narrative, with Vasquez calling Heard “a profoundly troubled person” who professes to be a victim but is, in fact, a perpetrator of domestic violence. Chew and Vasquez, who were first to speak, addressed Heard’s sexual assault claims preemptively and took direct aim at her credibility, which has come into question during the past 18 months as a result of testimony she gave at a different trial that has since begun to unravel. For its part, the ACLU avoided being served for months, but Depp’s lawyers deposed members of the nonprofit’s staff, who admitted that she had not honored the $3.5 million donation. “Ms. Heard had never made that accusation against Mr. Depp — it was never part of her allegations of abuse in 2016. (The Washington Post was not named in the actor’s suit.) Depp is suing Heard over an op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in which she claimed she was a survivor of domestic abuse.
Heard's counsel presents Depp as an 'an obsessed ex-husband hellbent on revenge'
Why, I’m not sure, because the evidence isn’t pretty for Mr Depp.” “She has been living and breathing this lie for years now,” she said. “But that’s going to come out over the course of this trial.” “Today, his name is associated with a lie. “She is preparing to give the performance of a lifetime in this trial.” Heard’s attorneys, meanwhile, argued that her allegations are true, she had a right to express her views, “and all Mr Depp has wanted to do is humiliate Amber, to haunt her, to wreck her career”.
Amber Heard "concocted a role as a victim", the former spouses' defamation trial is told.
She did not name Johnny Depp, she did not write the headline and in America there is a special constitutional protection for words written in the newspapers. "She has been living and breathing this role for years now and she is preparing to give the performance of her life." Yes, she had accused him of abuse but that was not what her article in the Washington Post was about. Before court proceedings began they were warned to keep phones hidden, to not take pictures, there would be no shouting of 'we love you, Johnny.' But as it began there was not a murmur or a sign of movement. Johnny Depp may have lost his case in London, this they feel will be different. "Mom would, she would scream, she would yell.
Johnny Depp is suing his ex-wife Amber Heard for defamation because of an op-ed she wrote about domestic abuse. Attorneys' opening statements indicate the ...
Rottenborn said he wasn’t sure why they were making that choice, given that the jury is about to see the “real” Depp under the money, fame and pirate costume. Some incidents, they said, happened when Depp was blacked out from drugs and alcohol, and his worst times were known as when “the Monster” would come out. “It is all a lie,” Vazquez said, calling Heard a “profoundly troubled person” who was about to “give the performance of her life” during the trial. They said she made up a story of him abusing her to keep him when he wanted to file for divorce, and when that didn’t work, she “recast herself as an abuse survivor.” They alleged that Heard made up elaborate stories and faked photos that showed her with bruises. He showed three statements from The Post’s op-ed on the screen that he said defamed Depp, who was not mentioned in the piece. “Ms. Heard did not use Mr. Depp’s name in the op-ed.
Johnny Depp and Amber Heard detail abuse allegations in opening statements in Depp's defamation trial on April 12 — with Heard accusing the former ...
The opening statements in Depp v Heard defamation duel in Virginia were no less shocking, despite being familiar from earlier trial in London in 2020.
"She said I needed to get off my cross and stay out of her marriage," Dembrowski said. She said Depp wanted a pre-nuptial agreement to protect his kids and Heard refused to sign. Dembrowski tried to push back against questions about texts she sent Depp in 2014, which Rottenborn asserted involved her telling him to stop drinking, taking cocaine and pills. "She said 'why would Dior want to do business with you, they’re about class and style, you don’t have style,' " Dembrowski said. "Amber made a mistake millions before her and millions after who are victims of domestic abuse - she chose to stay. She said her brother's reaction as a child was to run and hide during these episodes. One incident that stayed with her, she said, was after she met with Dior about working with Depp; Heard's reaction was disbelief and disgust. "The words she wrote are true...She drew on her experiences as someone who reported domestic abuse and there is no dispute she did in fact report this in 2016...This article is about the social change she is advocating and which the First Amendment protects." But Rottenborn argued the case is about the First Amendment and how it protects Heard's right to comment on a matter of public interest. "(Depp) will go to his grave knowing there are people out there in the world who believe he abused a woman," Vasquez said. Anticipating testimony that some witnesses claimed to see Heard without bruises or other marks of abuse after this alleged episode, Bredehoft said Heard never left her bedroom without full makeup. "By choosing to lie about her husband for her own personal benefit, (Heard) forever changed Mr. Depp's life and reputation.
As the former couple's dueling defamation cases got underway on Tuesday, Depp and Heard's teams previewed its case to come in their respective opening ...
(The actor was in a relationship with Vanessa Paradis, the mother of his two children, at the time.) “Two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out,” was what she wrote in 2018. A forensic pathologist will argue the injuries Heard sustained in one particular photo of alleged abuse are not consistent with her “brutal allegations,” Depp’s lawyers said. Chew focused on the reference to “two-years ago” in an op-ed written by Heard published by The Washington Post in 2018. It was apparent that anti-SLAPP legislation, intended to curb frivolous free-speech-related lawsuits against people exercising their First Amendment rights, will factor into Heard’s argument, as her team seemed tightly focused on her words in the op-ed at the center of the libel case. Depp’s lawyer, Benjamin Chew of the firm Brown Rudnick, went first, saying, “For nearly 30 years, Mr. Depp built a reputation as one of the most talented actors in Hollywood, a respected artist whose name was associated with success at the box office.
Johnny Depp's sister Christi Dembrowski was the first person to give evidence during the opening of his libel trial against his ex-wife Amber Heard.
"He wanted to make her life hard, he wanted to ruin her life. "Ms Heard took on the role of a lifetime, she couldn't back down. It's disturbing but not surprising." She is preparing to give the performance of a lifetime in this trial." "Words matter." A false statement uttered by his former wife, Amber Heard."
Johnny Depp's attorneys told jurors that "his name is associated with a lie," characterizing his ex-wife Amber Heard's claims of domestic abuse as false ...
“And the evidence will show that Ms. Heard’s false allegations had a significant impact on Mr. Depp’s family and his ability to work in the profession he loved, and loved to bring joy to everyone.” “The evidence will show that Ms. Heard showed up with a mark on her face that mysteriously appeared six days after she last saw Mr. Depp and six days before she publicly filed a request for a domestic violence restraining order alleging abuse.” Another attorney for Depp, Camille Vasquez, said that Depp himself was a survivor of his mother’s angry rages. As Chew spoke, Heard was on the other side of the courtroom, peering down at a legal pad. As she described Depp’s injuries, he flinched for a half second. The evidence will show that Mr. Depp learned that the best way to deal with violence was to leave. “But that’s going to come out over the course of this trial.” It is about the evidence. But this trial is about the evidence. Depp sued over Heard’s December, 2018, Washington Post op ed, which described herself as an abuse survivor but did not name her ex husband. “The evidence will show that six days after Mr. Depp requested a divorce, and he did so politely, and three days after Ms. Heard’s lawyer threatened Mr. Depp with claims of abuse if he did not agree to her financial demands, Ms. Heard arrived at the courthouse in Los Angeles, California to file for a restraining order alleging abuse,” Chew said. “The evidence will show that Disney had a dossier on him, that had articles from the press, had other information about Mr. Depp and they didn’t have this article at all in their files, didn’t register with them, just as it didn’t register with the public.”